Writers Per Hour

DO NOT WASTE YOUR TIME OR MONEY.

I have to use vacation time/pay at work in order to have this master's level literature review complete by the deadline, which is in 8 days. For $312 & a 2-weeks notice, I was prepared to be WOW-ed. WPH said my doc would be available a week after I really received it, so did WPH rush through my assignment? I've since read online that professional writers earn $100-$250/hour. Did WPH really spend only 3 hours on masters-level paper that I must submit w/n 60 days in order to graduate? Quite frankly, I am underwhelmed & very angry. I'd have been happy to pay double for high-quality writing, but now I'm gun-shy & can't waste anymore time. It's easier for me 2 write my own paper than to fix what WPH wrote for me.

*WPH is available for contact 24h/day, but is not available to respond 24h/day
*My PayPal payment went to someone in the country of Cyprus. Weird.
*My paper, it sure seems, was written by someone who learned British English as a 2nd language. It sounds funny & some vocabulary is misused, such as "exploited" for "explored"; "study" for "section;" "the" and "this" used interchangeably; and "ecological" for "environmental"--despite my sending WPH my project proposal, which gave a lot of background subject material to work with, including the use of ENVIRONMENTAL, Economic, and Social pillars of Sustainable Tourism
*The writer fulfilled the minimum number of words & pages via verbosity
*Helpful/meaningful transitions & sign-posting were scant to non-existent
*WPH used multiple sentences to tell the reader what ea section was about- despite subheadings- instead of just focusing on the material & getting on with it. This is a literature review; not a speech.
*The lit review included the subheadings: Overview; Growth of Camping Practices; Methodology; Discussion; Conclusion; & Recommendations, which is only 1 paragraph-long; and this paper is supposed to be an APA-style lit review re: how theories have progressed, up to & including the current paradigms re: Sustainable Tourism @ RV parks & campgrounds...as per my professors instructions that I shared with WPH
*Under Methodology, I can't tell if "author" is a reference to me or the scholarly writers in my references list
*I emailed WPH 13 bibliographical resources in .pdf form w/ my comments in Adobe yellow e-sticky notes. I even highlighted in yellow important parts w/n lengthy sources
*The writer did not follow my instructions that were written in an email & w/n Adobe comment sticky notes
-I said not to include research about Australia; WPH included info about Australia; cited secondary sources about AUS; and did so improperly
-My professor requires 8 references; WPH noted only 6 in the reference list
-I said I'd pay more money if the review needed more pages, so why didn't WPH include at least 2 more references?
-I used !'s in the naming convention for the .pdf's in order to denote my STRONGEST sources of which 2 were completely ignored

*Here are the opening lines of my lit review: "The section will give an outline of this literature review. Secondly, this segment will incorporate an analysis and background of sustainable tourism subject (Sustainability at RV Parks/Campgrounds) as denoted by various studies. It will establish the scope and importance of the topic. The phrase 'sustainable tourism' implies the practice of enjoying biodiversity responsibly. Visitors are accountable of the host community present and future by being sensitive to the ecology and culture. The goal of the trend is to maximize the benefits of touring both for the local people and the natural environment. On the other hand, the practice minimizes the costs and harming of the resources that form its backbone. The paper will focus on the specific forms of sight-seeing that have a deeper engagement with nature..."

WTH?

Your custom writing service deserves the highest ranks! Thank you for your help in writing my assignment.

Tom Green opted not to leave a text review of Writers Per Hour